<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philosophy Top 40</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profron.net/blog/2009/03/12/philosophy-top-40/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profron.net/blog/2009/03/12/philosophy-top-40/</link>
	<description>Prof. Ron McClamrock&#039;s vaguely academic web home</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:10:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Henry Manuel</title>
		<link>http://profron.net/blog/2009/03/12/philosophy-top-40/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Manuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 03:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profron.net/2009/03/12/philosophy-top-40/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Typical 19th century philosophy courses (especially in the analytic tradition) would include the 5 19th century philosophers in top ten: Marx, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Hegel and Mill. So Kierkegaard&#039;s high because of his more general inclusion with analytic philosophers than the truly specialized &quot;Continental&quot; philosophers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typical 19th century philosophy courses (especially in the analytic tradition) would include the 5 19th century philosophers in top ten: Marx, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Hegel and Mill. So Kierkegaard&#8217;s high because of his more general inclusion with analytic philosophers than the truly specialized &#8220;Continental&#8221; philosophers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
